Power and Property Rights
Locating Agrarian Publics
Environments Undone
Fate of Food
REGISTER!

About Us
Calendar
Postdoctoral Fellow
Graduate Seminar
Regional Comparisons
Logistics
Committed Participants
Bibliography
Contact Us
 



The Fifth Ministerial Meeting of the World Trade Organization came to a dramatic close in Cancún, Mexico: a small farmer from South Korea, Hyung-Kae Lee stabbed himself to death on the gates surrounding the conference venue and hotels. The image of Lee gesturing angrily towards his fellow protestors, with a sign hanging from his neck that read -- The WTO Kills Farmers! -- has become one of the enduring symbols of anti-free trade protest. This protest marks an explicit rejection of the increased commodification and globalization of agricultural production, knowledge, and nature. As we have entered into what Harriet Friedmann and Phillip McMichael (1989) call the Fourth World Food Regime, in which consumers across the globe are connected to commodity chains in agricultural products as diverse as beef, lettuce, and soybeans, the connection to the basic processes of food production have become increasingly tenuous.

Read More >>


FRIDAY, APRIL 25

SESSION 1
Fighting It Out: Labor, Capital, and Consumers in the World Food System
3:00 - 5:00pm, Saunders 220

Philip McMichael, Professor of Development Sociology, Cornell University

Roots of the world food crisis: the food regime at large.
Food riots cascading across the world, from Italy to Indonesia, are indicative of a 'perfect storm' linking peak oil to rising animal protein consumption and the agrofuels project. The new agflation suggests new pressures on food supplies, but rising food prices may express more fundamental restructuring of the corporate agro-food system. This paper examines these developments through a food regime lens.

 

Michael Schulman, William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor and Alumni Distinguished Graduate Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University

Food Fights: From the agrarian question to Animal House
Continued capitalist development has transformed the classic Marxist agrarian question about peasant differentiation and capitalist class formation into a set of "Animal House" like food fights across different social and spatial scales. This paper summarizes issues and analyses in the sociology of agriculture about the food fights concerning the structure of agriculture, agribusiness, global commodity chains, and consumption. While changes and trends identified by previous researchers continue, new problems and contradictions are identified. The fate of food will involve a multiple "fights" across different social and spatial scales with the intersecting inequalities of production, consumption, and reproduction. [Background reading]


Community Garden Tour and Demonstration
5 :00 - 7:00pm, Saunders 220

Christof Den Biggelaar, Professor of Agro-ecology at Appalachian State
University, will lead a soil-building workshop, discussing the politics
of on-farm nutrient cycles, compost, bed preparation, cover crops and
green manure in the context of the fate of food. Participants will be
invited to help prepare a new garden bed at the campus community garden.

Get your hands dirty alongside students, professors, and community
members and learn about local food systems

Sponsored by Fair, Local, Organic (FLO) Food, Social Movement Working
Group, and the Center for Integrating Research and Action (CIRA)



SATURDAY, APRIL 26

BREAKFAST
9:30am - 10:00am, Fed Ex Global Education Center, Room 1005


SESSION 2
The Contested Moral Economies of Transnational Food Systems
10:00am - 12:00pm Room 1005

Discussant: Ted Mouw, Associate Professor of Sociology at University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Catherine Dolan, fellow at Templeton College and lecturer at Oxford University

Virtual Moralities: The Mainstreaming of Fairtrade in Kenyan Tea Fields
Fairtrade was founded to alleviate poverty and economic injustice through a market-based form of solidarity exchange, one that aspired to embed alternative values in North South commodity chains. Yet with the increasing participation of transnational food corporations in Fairtrade sourcing, new questions are emerging on the extent to which the model offers an alternative to the inimical tendencies of neoliberalism. Drawing on a qualitative research project of Kenyan Fairtrade tea, this paper examines how the process of corporate mainstreaming influences the structure and outcomes of Fairtrade, and specifically the challenges it poses for the realization of Fairtrade's development aspirations. It argues firstly that while the communities of Kiegoi have experienced tangible benefits from Fairtrade's social premium, these development 'gifts' have been conferred through processes marked less by collaboration and consent than by patronage and exclusion. These contradictions are often glossed by the symbolic force of Fairtrade's benevolence and the quixotic appeal of its key tenets --- empowerment, participation, and justice --- which simultaneously serve to neutralize critique and mystify the functions that Fairtrade performs for the political economy of development and neoliberalism. Second, building on recent critiques of CSR, the paper explores how certain neoliberal rationalities are emboldened through Fairtrade, as a process of mainstreaming installs new metrics of governance (standards, certification, participation) that are at once moral and technocratic, voluntary and coercive, and inclusionary and marginalizing. The paper concludes that these technologies have divested exchange of mutuality, as the routinized exchanges of codified information replace global partnerships and affinities with the totemic features of neoliberal regulation --- standards, procedures and protocols that render north south partnerships ever more virtual and depoliticized. [Paper references]

Steve Stiffler, Associate Professor of Anthropology and Latin American Studies, University of Arkansas

The Fruit of Neoliberalism: How the Banana became so Unhealthy for Workers, Farmers, Consumers, the Environment, and even the Banana Itself
This paper looks at the past and present of the banana industry, focusing particularly on how the rise of contract farming and the attack on labor organizing have created an industry characterized by the exploitation of workers and small-scale farmers; an environmental disaster; a fruit that is unhealthy for consumers; and a banana that is too smart for its own good. The paper also looks at how popular struggles have shaped and challenged the banana industry.


LUNCH
12:00pm - 1:00pm Atrium


SESSION 3
Cultivating Alternatives in a Neoliberal Field
1:00pm - 3:00pm Room 1005

Jeff Boyer, professor of Anthropology and founder of the Goodnight Family Sustainable Development Program, Appalachian State University

Food Strategies and Sustainable Agriculture Battles in Neoliberal Honduras
This paper traces the demise of Honduras' traditional role as Central America's larder for basic grains and livestock with the neoliberal assault on farmer first strategies and Mesoamerican diets. Since the mid-1980s, U.S-led "agricultural modernization" policies have privileged the entry of foreign agribusinesses and industrial foods, the privatization of common lands and cooperative marketing strategies, while abandoning prior commitments to a peasant-centered agrarian reform. The results include real hunger and significant out-migration from the countryside, as well as a simultaneous rise of obesity and heart disease with increased consumption of processed and fast foods in cities and towns. Current debates over food security (the dominant discourse and strategy) versus food sovereignty (the "progressive" response) suggest that until the political will is found reunite food and consumption issues with the fundamental agrarian question (i.e. who controls the land and exchange of locally rendered foodstuffs), popular sustainable agriculture strategies for the select few will remain little more than neoliberalism's "Janus face."
[Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7]

 

Dorothy Holland, Cary C. Boshamer Professor of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with Leslie Hossfeld, Alice Brooke Wilson, Brady Gordon, Mari Howe, Sara Safransky, and other members of PLAN 823(2) and Leslie Hossfeld, public sociologist, University of North Carolina Wilmington University of North Carolina Wilmington

A Civil Society/University Collaboration to Rebuild Local Food Systems in North Carolina: Assessing the Potential
This presentation and its associated document describe one component of the efforts of a community-university collaboration to re-establish local food systems in North Carolina. A graduate workshop class in City and Regional Planning designed and carried out the research in collaboration with the Center for Integrating Research and Action, an interdisciplinary working group at UNC-CH dedicated to addressing social problems in partnership with civil society organizations, and the Center for Community Action, a community-based organization in Lumberton, North Carolina. Focusing on a four-county region in Southeastern North Carolina, the class assessed the current state of agricultural production in the region, surveyed local institutions on fruit and vegetable purchasing habits, and analyzed the potential for increasing production, processing distribution, and consumption of local food, and what impacts this might have on the region’s community and economy. CIRA and CCA will use the report to appeal to local, regional and statewide policy and decision makers to invest in local food initiatives. Besides describing the project, which bears many similarities to ones being undertaken elsewhere by the local food movement and its quest to create alternatives to the global food system, we ask, on a broader scale, whether such efforts can ultimately assist the movement in overcoming its class-based limitations and so escape being part of, rather than a challenge to, neoliberal designs on food.

 


FINAL ROUNDTABLE WITH ALL PARTICIPANTS
3:15 - 4:00pm Room 1005



 

 

This Sawyer Seminar, funded by the Mellon Foundation, includes a year-long series of working group meetings
and mini-conferences on the central theme of globalization and the land. It is hosted by UNC's Center for Global Initiatives.